ANALYSIS
IF IT is executed competently, Kevin Rudd's internet plan will equip Australia with the world's foremost tool for innovation and growth.
The Prime Minister's earlier plan promised a pedestrian system that was outmoded even before it was announced. The ambitious revised proposal is cutting-edge and allows for almost infinite upgrading as technology advances. "This puts Australia several years ahead of the US," one of the creators of the internet, Larry Smarr, said of the Government's announcement.
"My great hope is that Australia will show the way for the US," said Smarr, the head of the California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology.
And by making the Government the prime actor and not just the director, Rudd has thrown out three decades of ideology.
"Government is back," said Chris Richardson of the consultancy Access Economics.
This is the wholesale politics of Rudd's policy - a "nation-building" plan by a decisive leader with a vision for a prosperous future.
With the Government to own 51 per cent of the equity, Rudd has in effect closed the Australian sub-branch of the Thatcher-Reagan revolution.
But he has not opened a branch of the Fabian socialists - his plan is that the Government will sell its holding five years after the system is finished.
Smarr compared the plan to the 1956 decision by the president Dwight Eisenhower to build the publicly funded interstate highway system. He nominated four of the features of Rudd's plan as being models for a world-class system: the use of fibre-optic cable all the way to the home, the target connection speed of 100 megabits a second, the universality of its reach, and the public-private structure of the venture.
Other countries such as South Korea and Singapore are installing similarly advanced internet systems. But none is attempting to do so on a continental scale.
Access Economics's Chris Richardson, customarily a wary watcher of government spending, said this was a case where "the budget cost is not the central consideration".
Why not? "Take a step back and look at the two big aims of government: prosperity and fairness. On prosperity, the tyranny of distance has held Australia back economically for a long time. The advantage of this technology is that it allows us to compete in the world more fully.
"On fairness, the Government is really paying a lot of money here to buy more competitiveness for Australians."
The ultimate cost to taxpayers, he said, would turn on whether the venture was profitable and could be sold at a premium. But the financial risks, while they are big, will not be evident for years after the next election.
The retail politics of this plan? You will eventually get faster internet connections at your home and public works in Your community.
And while Rudd is acting, Malcolm Turnbull will be relegated to carping, the "angry last paragraph" that opposition leaders dread.